{"id":2090,"date":"2010-09-25T10:13:47","date_gmt":"2010-09-25T04:43:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/greenworldinvestor.com\/?p=2090"},"modified":"2010-09-25T10:13:47","modified_gmt":"2010-09-25T04:43:47","slug":"indian-regulator-sebi-ignores-key-concerns-as-it-chides-investment-banks-over-trivial-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/2010\/09\/25\/indian-regulator-sebi-ignores-key-concerns-as-it-chides-investment-banks-over-trivial-issues\/","title":{"rendered":"Indian Regulator SEBI ignores Key Concerns as it Chides Investment Banks over Trivial issues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>India&#8217;s Stock Market Regulator SEBI has castigated the investment bankers for giving investors the short end of the stick.The regulator accused the I-Banking community of only looking out for the interests of the promoters by pricing primary issues too high.The proof is in the fact that 62% of the IPOs in the last 3 years are trading at below issue price despite the fact that Indian markets are near an all time high.Bad practises such as\u00a0 charging zero fees from big band government divestment,unethical if not illegal promotion of IPO companies through planted ads in newspapers were some of the other things that SEBI found objectionable.<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/business.rediff.com\/report\/2010\/sep\/25\/sebi-red-flags-zero-fees.htm\">Sebi red flags IPO pricing, zero fees &#8211; Rediff<\/a><\/h4>\n<blockquote><p>The Securities &amp; Exchange Board of India  (Sebi) pulled up investment bankers for holding the interests of   promoters above those of investors. &#8220;If you look at maximising the price   for promoters, then obviously you are not looking after the interests   of investors,&#8221; said Sebi Chairman C B Bhave. Sebi&#8217;s  concerns on IPO pricing were further  corroborated by a report released  by CARE Ratings. Analysis of 116 IPOs  between August 2007 and August  2010 revealed that &#8220;about 62 per cent of  IPOs are currently trading  lower than the IPO price band&#8221;. Citing a  survey conducted by Assocham,  the report stated: &#8220;A majority of CEOs and  CFOs attributed the lukewarm  response to IPOs to bad pricing and weak  market sentiment.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Bhave  also expressed reservations on investment  bankers quoting near-zero  fees to bag divestment issuances. &#8220;(Investment  bankers) need to  introspect whether it is healthy competition,&#8221; he  said. Bhave added  that in some issues, bankers &#8220;outbid each other (by)  working for free&#8221;.Reports suggest that six banks quoted a fee of Rs 12,500 to manage the Coal India IPO that will raise around Rs 14,000 crore.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>SEBI Reluctant to Address Key Concerns<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>However the Stock Market Regulator missed on touching key issues such as  manipulation of small cap IPOs,pump and dump schemes etc.The Stock  Market Regulator\u00a0 has also itself been under fire for being partisan in  its treatment of National Stock Exchange (NSE).Another bourse the MCX  has accused SEBI of\u00a0 serving the monopoly interest of NSE by denying  stock trading rights to other newer exchanges.There seems to be some truth in these allegations as there have been no big prosecutions in India despite some blatant cases of stock market manipulation.Big Brokers and Market Operators have pretty much of a free reign in the Indian markets.A lot of the money entering the Stock Market from the FII route is said to be illegally stashed black money of corrupt rich Indian in foreign banks.These are some of the key concerns which the SEBI seems reluctant to look into.<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"http:\/\/www.business-standard.com\/india\/news\/sebi-tricked-us-claims-mcx-sx\/408780\/\">Sebi tricked us, claims MCX-SX &#8211;\u00a0 BS<\/a><\/h4>\n<blockquote><p>Just days before the court-mandated verdict on its application for a  stock exchange licence, the MCX Stock Exchange (MCX-SX) has accused  Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) of blatant favouritism and  \u201ctricking it with ulterior intent\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>In a strongly-worded letter to Sebi dated September 16, MCX-SX has  questioned Sebi\u2019s motive in opposing its capital restructuring plan.  \u201cThe real question Sebi has to answer is that if they had such serious  reservation to the scheme of reduction of capital and issuance of  warrants, then how can Sebi justify its own role in first prompting the  scheme through its executive director (J N Gupta) and later its chairman  expressing no concern or reservation?\u201d the letter asked.<\/p>\n<p>The MCX-SX letter states that Sebi\u2019s delay in approving its  application for other segments on the pretext of warrants, \u201cgives an  impression that the applicant has been tricked into this situation with  ulterior intent\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the fact that the entire scheme was suggested by Sebi on  October 5, 2009, the MCX-SX letter continues, Sebi has raised issues  almost a year after MCX-SX approached the Bombay High Court. \u201cThe  silence of Sebi, despite having full information since October 5, 2009,  appears to be with design of damaging the applicant\u2019s business and  reputation. The advantage of this delay and the damage to our business  and reputation is only to NSE,\u201d it stated.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>India&#8217;s Stock Market Regulator SEBI has castigated the investment bankers for giving investors the short end of the stick.The regulator accused the I-Banking community of only looking out for the interests of the promoters by pricing primary issues too high.The proof is in the fact that 62% of the IPOs in the last 3 years are trading at below issue price despite the fact that Indian markets are near an all time high.Bad practises such as  charging zero fees from big band government divestment,unethical if not illegal promotion of IPO companies through planted ads in newspapers were some of the other things that SEBI found objectionable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[3157,3536,4201,4317,5264],"class_list":["post-2090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ipo-indian-capital-markets","tag-ipo-indian-capital-markets","tag-manipulation","tag-pump-and-dump","tag-regulator","tag-stock-market"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2090"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2090\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iiec-india.org\/greenworld\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}